ITRA and their “RCI Action Group” now mis- using the name of Mindtimeshare

no win no fee 2

It has been said before on this blog in numerous occasions, ITRA the International Timeshare Refund Action likes to use other names in order to confuse consumers of who they really are.

Companies such as Cancelourtimeshare, Long Elmes, Purple Tower Solutions, Pure Solutions Services, etc. all end up being the same call centers for appointments for the ITRA Presentation.

A presentation where Timeshare consumers supposedly are going to be informed about joining a Class Action, the RCI Action Group on a “No Win No Fee” basis, but where for some strange reason a lot of the consumers end up paying thousands of pounds for dubious disposal services or previously a Club Class Membership.

The latest from ITRA though is an email campaign to the Timeshare Owners from an email address info@mindtimeshare.co.uk with subject line: “Note from Mind Timeshare”

Why on earth would a “genuine” and honest company, which looks out for the well-being of their customers have to pretend to be someone else?

Would any company ever buy the domain name of their supposed “enemy” and send emails from that domain pretending to be them? What other reason can there be behind this, other than cheating consumers and doing harm to both consumers and Mindtimeshare?

Together with all this, we still want to raise the question on how a reputable Lawyers company such as Edwin Coe LLP continue to back this up and provide their services to ITRA?

Have they not seen the words of the BIS last October when 7 companies of the Club Class Group were wound up?

Are they not aware of consumers continuously being approached on cold calls, without a clear explanation of where ITRA obtained their personal and supposedly protected information from?

We certainly think that nothing of the above can be explained logically and different to the fact they are here to confuse consumers, harm Mindtimeshare and get more money out of the consumers for whatever it takes.

How long will this go on before the authorities take action once and for all?

About mindtimeshare

Mindtimeshare SLU is registered Company reg number: B35957182 Mindtimeshare provides assistance to timeshare owners who have been defrauded by holiday clubs and bogus resale companies. The Mindtimeshare project was launched in February 2011. After dealing with timeshare members over several years who had been defrauded by numerous bogus companies and for large amounts of money, I considered launching an Organisation to help timeshare owners that have been targeted by bogus companies. On this blog you can find information about the different active scam companies and their “modus operandi” and also place comments, ask questions and see comments from other consumers who have the same doubts or have been through the same experience. Mindtimeshare has resulted in a huge success and has received the back up from not only timeshare consumers but also from the professionals in the timeshare Industry. Mindtimeshare helps timeshare owners who have been scammed by bogus Discount Holiday Clubs; bogus cash back companies; fraudulent timeshare resale companies; bogus class action companies and false lawyers and notaries. We offer professional answers and advice to Timeshare users. If you want to send an email instead of posting a comment on the blog please do so by emailing: customercare@mindtimeshare.com
This entry was posted in Bogus Holiday Clubs, Canary Islands, Club Class Group of Companies, Costa del Sol, Mediation services, Warnings and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to ITRA and their “RCI Action Group” now mis- using the name of Mindtimeshare

  1. Hamish says:

    A point of interest to anyone thinking of joining the ITRA Class Action.
    If you search for the Class Action precedent in the USA (The Glenz v RCI case) you will see that it is a “Win” precedent which ITRA are apparently trying to copy. The lawyers did very well out of the case and all their fees were met. The case did not actually go to trial as RCI negotiated a settlement but the “No Win No Fee” lawyers effectively won the case and were therefore also entitled to a percentage of each individual member’s compensation according to the “No Win No Fee” agreements such as currently peddled by ITRA.
    Compensation for individual members was US$12 and former members US$10 each.
    Strange that ITRA have not quoted these figures. “Damages have been estimated at up to £20,000 per claimant” according to ITRA publicity for their Class Action.
    Although this US precedent is not binding on a European Class Action it is a directly relevant precedent which will be taken into account in any similar court action or a possibly more likely RCI negotiated settlement out of court.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s